Netrows vs Clay: Which B2B Data Platform is Right for You? (2026)
A detailed comparison of Netrows and Clay for B2B data enrichment. Pricing, features, use cases, and which platform delivers better value for developers and sales teams.
Overview: Netrows vs Clay
Both Netrows and Clay help businesses enrich B2B data, but they take fundamentally different approaches. Clay is a no-code platform with a spreadsheet-like interface designed for sales and marketing teams. Netrows is a developer-first API platform built for engineers who need real-time data in their applications.
Think of it this way: Clay is like Airtable meets data enrichment. Netrows is like Stripe meets LinkedIn data. Different tools for different users.
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | Netrows | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Interface | REST API | Web UI (Spreadsheet) |
| Target User | Developers | Sales/Marketing Teams |
| Starting Price | €49/month | $149/month |
| Data Freshness | Real-time | Mixed |
| LinkedIn Endpoints | 48+ | Via integrations |
| X (Twitter) Data | 26 endpoints | No |
| Profile Monitoring | Yes (Radar) | No |
| No-Code Workflows | No | Yes |
| AI Features | No | Yes (Claygent) |
Netrows: Developer-First API Platform
What Netrows Does Best
- Real-Time Data: Every API call fetches current data from LinkedIn, not a stale database
- Comprehensive Coverage: 48+ LinkedIn endpoints, 26 X endpoints, plus Crunchbase, Glassdoor, Reddit
- Profile Monitoring: Track profiles and companies for changes with webhook notifications
- Developer Experience: Clean REST API, OpenAPI spec, code examples in 7 languages
- Transparent Pricing: Simple credit-based model, no hidden fees, no per-seat pricing
Best For
- Developers building data enrichment into their applications
- SaaS companies needing real-time profile data
- Teams that want API-first infrastructure
- Companies monitoring competitors or tracking job changes
- Startups that need flexible monthly subscriptions
Limitations
- No visual interface for non-technical users
- Requires development work to integrate
- No built-in AI research assistant
- No workflow automation UI
Clay: No-Code Data Platform
What Clay Does Best
- No-Code Interface: Spreadsheet-like UI that sales teams can use without developers
- Workflow Automation: Build multi-step enrichment workflows visually
- AI Research: Claygent can research companies and write personalized outreach
- Integrations: Connects to 50+ data providers and tools
- Templates: Pre-built workflows for common use cases
Best For
- Sales and marketing teams without developers
- Companies that need workflow automation
- Teams doing manual research and outreach
- Organizations that want AI-powered personalization
- Users comfortable with spreadsheet interfaces
Limitations
- More expensive ($149/month minimum vs €49/month)
- Data freshness varies by integration
- Limited API access (platform-first, not API-first)
- Per-seat pricing gets expensive for teams
- No X (Twitter) data
- No profile monitoring features
Pricing Comparison
Netrows Pricing
- Starter: €49/month - 10,000 credits, 50 req/min
- Growth: €299/month - 100,000 credits, 150 req/min
- Enterprise: €1,299/month - 500,000 credits, 500 req/min
- 100 free credits on signup to test all endpoints
- No per-seat fees: Entire team uses same account
Clay Pricing
- Starter: $149/month - 2,000 credits/month
- Explorer: $349/month - 10,000 credits/month
- Pro: $800/month - 50,000 credits/month
- Per-seat pricing: Additional users cost extra
- Credits vary by action: Some enrichments cost more credits
Cost Analysis
For 10,000 enrichments per month:
- Netrows: €49/month (Starter plan)
- Clay: $349/month (Explorer plan)
- Difference: Clay costs 7x more for the same volume
However, Clay includes workflow automation and AI features that Netrows doesn't have. If you need those features and don't have developers, Clay's higher price may be justified.
Data Quality & Freshness
Netrows
Every API call fetches real-time data directly from LinkedIn. If someone updated their profile 5 minutes ago, you'll see that change. This is critical for time-sensitive use cases like tracking job changes or monitoring competitor hiring.
Clay
Clay aggregates data from multiple providers. Some integrations provide real-time data, others use databases that may be weeks or months old. Data freshness depends on which integration you're using. For example, Apollo.io data in Clay comes from Apollo's database, not live LinkedIn.
Use Case Scenarios
Scenario 1: Building a SaaS Product
You're building a sales intelligence tool that enriches leads in real-time as they sign up.
Winner: Netrows - You need an API, real-time data, and developer-friendly documentation. Clay's spreadsheet interface doesn't fit this use case.
Scenario 2: Sales Team Prospecting
Your sales team needs to build targeted lists, enrich them, and generate personalized outreach.
Winner: Clay - The no-code interface, AI research assistant, and workflow automation are perfect for sales teams. Netrows would require developer support.
Scenario 3: Monitoring Competitors
You want to track when competitors hire executives or when key employees leave.
Winner: Netrows - Radar monitoring with webhooks is built for this. Clay doesn't have profile monitoring features.
Scenario 4: Startup with Limited Budget
You need data enrichment but have a tight budget and technical resources.
Winner: Netrows - At €49/month vs $149/month, Netrows is 3x cheaper. If you have a developer, the ROI is clear.
Scenario 5: Enterprise with No Dev Team
Large sales organization needs enrichment but IT is backlogged for 6 months.
Winner: Clay - Sales ops can set up workflows without waiting for developers. The higher price is worth the speed to value.
Integration & Developer Experience
Netrows
- Clean REST API with OpenAPI specification
- Code examples in Python, Node.js, Go, Ruby, PHP, cURL, JavaScript
- Webhook support for real-time notifications
- MCP Server for AI assistant integration
- Attio CRM native integration
- Comprehensive API documentation with interactive playground
Clay
- 50+ pre-built integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Apollo, etc.)
- Zapier and Make.com connections
- HTTP API for custom integrations
- Webhook triggers for automation
- CSV import/export
- Limited API documentation (platform-first approach)
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Netrows If:
- You have developers on your team
- You need real-time, fresh data
- You're building data enrichment into your product
- You want to monitor profiles or companies for changes
- You need X (Twitter) data in addition to LinkedIn
- Budget is a primary concern
- You prefer API-first infrastructure
Choose Clay If:
- You don't have developers available
- You need workflow automation and AI features
- Your team prefers spreadsheet interfaces
- You want pre-built templates and integrations
- You need to move fast without technical dependencies
- Budget is less of a concern than speed to value
Can You Use Both?
Yes! Some companies use Netrows for their product/API needs and Clay for sales team workflows. They serve different purposes and can complement each other.
Try Netrows Free
Get started with 100 free credits. No credit card required. Test all 115+ API endpoints including LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Crunchbase, and more.